Design of a Self-Assessment Proposal for the Development of Student Self-Regulation in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.26.1.34028Keywords:
competency-based assessment, online higher education, self-assessment, self-regulation, student-centered learning designAbstract
Competency assessment in Higher Education is one of the biggest challenges which universities face nowadays. This paper shows the evolution of a transversal methodological proposal in an online master's program, for the development and evaluation of the students' self-regulation capacity through a self-assessment strategy based on a dialogue with the teachers. This evolution, the result of the continuous evaluation of the proposal implementation, entails changes both in the initial methodological approach as well as in the integration of technology as a facilitator of the process. Based on the concept of student-centered design, a longitudinal study is suggested over three academic years in which the opinion and perception of the program's students and teachers are systematically collected. In particular, and through an analysis of aspects for improvement emerging in each of the three phases, a set of decisions are identified to the original design that has finally led to the creation and integration of an ad hoc tool for the support of competencies self-assessment and to self-regulation in a virtual environment. The conclusions of this study highlight the importance of thinking about solutions in an integral way, including scaffolding activities for student self-reflection, teacher training in competency-based learning and evaluation, and development or integration of appropriate tools for the support of these processes.
Based on the concept of student-centered design, we propose a longitudinal study over three academic years in which the opinion and perception of the program's students and faculty is systematically collected. Specifically, and through an analysis of aspects for improvement emerging in each of the three phases, we identify a set of decisions to the original design that has finally led to the creation and integration of an ad hoc tool for the support of competencies self-assessment and to self-regulation in a virtual environment.
FULL ARTICLE:
https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/34028/26886
Downloads
References
Andrade, H. L. (2019). A Critical Review of Research on Student Self-Assessment. Front. Educ. 4(87), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
Biggs, J., y Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Open University Press.
Bolívar, A. (2008). Ciudadanía y competencias básicas. Fundación ECOEM.
Broadbent, J., Sharman, S., Panadero, E., y Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2021). How does self-regulated learning influence formative assessment and summative grade? Comparing online and blended learners. Internet and Higher Education, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100805
Cabrera, N., Mayordomo, R., y Espasa, A. (2013). La rúbrica como instrumento de evaluación de un diario de prácticas. En P. C. Muñoz Carril, M. Raposo-Rivas, M. González Sanmamed, M. E. Martínez-Figueira, M. Zabalza-Cerdeiriña y A. Pérez-Abellás (Eds.), Un Prácticum para la formación integral de los estudiantes. Andavira.
Cano, E. (Coord.) (2011). Buenas prácticas en la evaluación por competencias. Cinco casos de educación superior. Laertes educación.
De la Cruz, G., y Abreu, L. F. (2014). Rúbricas y autorregulación: pautas para promover una cultura de la autonomía en la formación profesional terciaria. REDU-Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 12(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2014.6429
Earl, L., y Katz, S. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind. Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning. Western and Northern Canadian Protocol for Collaboration in Education (WNCP). https://open.alberta.ca/publications/rethinking-classroom-assessment-with-purpose-in-mind
Goodrich, H. W. (1996). Student self-assessment: At the intersection of metacognition and authentic assessment. ProQuest Information y Learning, 57.
Granberg, C., Palm, T., y Palmberg, B. (2021). A case study of a formative assessment practice and the effects on students’ self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955
Gros, B., y Durall, E. (2020). Retos y oportunidades del diseño participativo en tecnología educativa. EDUTEC-Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 74, 12-24. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2020.74.1761
Hawe, E., Dixon, H., Murray, J., y Chandler, S. (2021). Using rubrics and exemplars to develop students’ evaluative and productive knowledge and skill. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(8), 1033-1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1851358
Hernández Rivero, V. M., Santana Bonilla, P. J., y Sosa Alonso, J. J. (2021). Feedback y autorregulación del aprendizaje en educación superior. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 39(1), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.423341
Le Boterf, G., Vincent, F., y Barzucchetti, S. (1993). Cómo gestionar la calidad de la formación. Gestión 2000.
Lee, E., y Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: own it, learn it, and share it. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 707-734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9422-5
López López, M. C., León Guerrero, M. J., y Pérez García, P. (2018). El enfoque por competencias en el contexto universitario español. La visión del profesorado. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 36(2), 529-545. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.36.2.314351
McCombs, B. L. (2000). Assessing the role of Educational Technology in the teaching and learning process: A learner-centered perspective. The Secretary's Conference on Educational Technology (pp. 92-104). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED452828.pdf
McIver, S., y Murphy, B. (2021). Self-assessment and what happens over time: Student and staff perspectives, expectations and outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874211054755
Nieminen, J. H., Asikainen, H., y Rämö, J. (2021). Promoting deep approach to learning and self-efficacy by changing the purpose of self-assessment: a comparison of summative and formative models. Studies in Higher Education, 46(7), 1296-1311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1688282
Noonan, B., y Duncan, C. R. (2005). Peer and self-assessment in high schools. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(17), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.7275/a166-vm41
Panadero, E., y Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 11, 551-576. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.30.12200
Panadero, E., Brown, G. L., y Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: a review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 28, 803-830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. En M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd Ed.). Sage.
Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., y Hay, K. E. (1994). Learner-centered design: the challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interactions, 1(2), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1145/174809.174813
Tan, K. H. K. (2012). Student self-assessment: Assessment, learning and empowerment. Research Publishing.
Tejada, J. (1999). Acerca de las competencias profesionales I. Herramientas, 56, 20-30.
Van Merriënboer, J. (2019). The four-component instructional design mModel. An overview of its main design principles. School of Health Professions Education. https://bit.ly/3caJAAx
Villardón, L. (2006). Evaluación del aprendizaje para promover el desarrollo de las competencias. Educatio siglo XXI, 24, 57-76. https://revistas.um.es/educatio/article/view/153
Zabalza Beraza, M. Á., y Enjo, L. L. (2019). El desafío de evaluar por competencias en la universidad. Reflexiones y experiencias prácticas. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 12(2), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2019.12.2.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Maite Fernández-Ferrer, Nati Cabrera, Marcelo Fabián Maina, Albert Sangrà
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles that are published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The authors grant the exploitation rights of the work accepted for publication to RIED, guarantee to the journal the right to be the first publication of research understaken and permit the journal to distribute the work published under the license indicated in point 2.
2. The articles are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate electronically the OnlineFirst version (assessed version and accepted for publication) of its articles before publication, always with reference to its publication by RIED, favoring its circulation and dissemination earlier and with this a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
