Self-Regulated Feedback Processes Enhanced by Technology in Higher Education: a Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.28886Keywords:
self-regulated learning, higher education, information and communication technologies, feedbackAbstract
Self-regulated learning in higher education can be developed through the promotion of evaluative judgment which can be acquired through peer evaluation or self-evaluation processes. In these processes feedback must be provided for scaffolding the cognitive, metacognitive and affective components of self-regulation. Technology can add value to this process. However, the literature seems to state an instrumental use of technology more than a use helpful for self-regulated learning. This paper presents the results of a systematic review process on the recent contributions regarding the role of technology to support feedback. The findings show that, despite the increase in software and technical possibilities offered by new digital technologies, the use that is given to current digital technologies continues to be linked to the management and storage of data, the speed and ease of data processing. qualification or, in some cases, increasing student motivation. However, the benefits of the use of technology in terms of the self-regulated learning processes that such technologies could bring about with an active use of students is still a pending field for research.
FULL ARTICLE:
https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/28886/23178
Downloads
References
Barberá, E. (2016). Aportaciones de la tecnología a la e-Evaluación. Revista De Educación a Distancia (RED), 50. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/50/4
Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E., y Boud, D. (2017). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 672-682. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12439
Bhagat K. K., y Spector J. M. (2017). Formative assessment in complex problem-solving domains: The emerging role of assessment technologies. Educational Technology and Society, 20(4), 312-317. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85032206740ypartnerID=40ymd5=8d0b948a16a24cf01361863040b44614
Biggs, J. B., y Tang, C. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Black, P., y Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Boekaerts, M., y Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 2, 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728
Boud, D., y Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
Broadbent, J., Panadero, E., Lodge, J. M., y de Barba, P. (2020). Technologies to enhance self-regulated learning in online and computer mediated learning environments. In M. J. Bishop, J. Elen, E. Boling y V. Svihla (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36119-8_3
Carless, D. (2016). Feedback as Dialogue. Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_389-1
Carless, D., y Boud, D (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Cano, E., Pons, L., y Lluch, L. (2020). Guía Feedback en la educación superior. Barcelona: UB. http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/158466/1/Guia_feedback_Educacio_Superior_Cano_Pons_Lluch.pdf
Cubero, J., Ibarra, M. S., y Rodríguez G. (2018). Development and use of mobile technologies that foster students' evaluative judgement: a design-based research. Conference paper. Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, TEMM'18, Salamanca, Spain, (pp. 151-156). https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284207
Deneen, C., y Munshi, C. (2018). Technology-enabled feedback: It’s time for a critical review of research and practice. In M. Campbell, J. Willems, C. Adachi, D. Blake, I. Doherty, S. Krishnan, S. Macfarlane, L. Ngo, M. O’Donnell, S. Palmer, L. Riddell, I. Story, H. Suri y J. Tai (Eds.), Open Oceans: Learning without borders. Proceedings ASCILITE 2018 Geelong, pp. 113-120.
EACEA (2019). Eurydice Brief. Digital Education at School in Europe. Luxemburg: Eurydice.
EDUCAUSE (2020). Horizon Report. Teaching and Learning Edition. https://tinyurl.com/yyqerf6b
García-Jiménez, E. (2015). La evaluación del aprendizaje: de la retroalimentación a la autorregulación. El papel de las tecnologías. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, RELIEVE, 21(2), art. M2. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.21.2.7546
García López, A., y García Mazarío, F. (2016). The use of technology in a model of formative assessment. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(2), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.190
Gikandi J. W., y Morrow J. W. (2014). Designing and implementing peer formative feedback within online learning environments. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(2), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1058853
Gros, B., y Suárez, C. (Coord). (2016). Pedagogía Red. Una educación para tiempos de internet. Ediciones Octaedro.
Harindranathan, P., y Folkestad, J. (2019). Learning analytics to inform the learning design: Supporting instructor’s inquiry into student learning in unsupervised technology enhanced platforms. Online Learning, 23(3), 34-55. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i3.2057
Hattie, J., y Timperley, H. (2007). The power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Kim, M. K., Zouaq, A., y Kim S. M. (2016). Automatic detection of expert models: The exploration of expert modeling methods applicable to technology-based assessment and instruction, Computers y Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.007
Kitchenham, B., y Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keele University y University of Durham. https://bit.ly/2LmHwbj
Koskinen, P., Lämsä, J., Maunuksela, J., Hämäläinen, R., y Viiri, J. (2018). Primetime learning: collaborative and technology-enhanced studying with genuine teacher presence. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0113-8
Lluch, L., Pons, L., y Cano, E. (2020). La evaluación entre iguales para contribuir al desarrollo de la competencia de aprender a aprender en el grado de maestro de educación primaria. En R. Roig-Vila (Coord.), Redes de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria (pp. 273-284). Alicate: ICE de la Universidad de Alicante.
Panadero, E., Broadbent, J., Boud, D., y Lodge, J. M. (2018). Using formative assessment to influence self- and co-regulated learning: The role of evaluative judgement. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0407-8
Pinto, M., y Leite, C. (2020). Digital technologies in support of students learning in Higher Education: literature review. Digital Education Review, 37, 343-360. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.343-360
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning. Handbook of Self-Regulation, 451-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
Puentedura, R. (2008). Models for enhancing technology integration. http://formacion.intef.es/pluginfile.php/43578/mod_imscp/content/1/modelo_samr.html
Ramírez; M. S., y Lugo, J. (2020). Revisión sistemática de métodos mixtos en el marco de la innovación educativa. Comunicar, 65(28), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-01
Raposo, M., y Cebrián, M. (2019). Technology to improve the assessment of learning. Digital Education Review, 35, 1-13.
Robertson S. N., Humphrey S. M., y Steele J. P. (2019). Using technology tools for formative assessments. Journal of Educators, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2019.16.2.11
Rodríguez, G., e Ibarra, M. S. (Eds.) (2011). e- Evaluación orientada al e-Aprendizaje estratégico. Narcea,
Said, M. M. T, Aravind, V. R., Ferdinand-James, D., y Umachandran, K. (2019). Dissecting assessment: A paradigm shift towards technology-enhanced assessments. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11(2), 24-32.
Sanmartí, N. (2010). Avaluar per aprendre. Generalitat de Catalunya. https://tinyurl.com/y2622dbc
Santamaría, M., Hernández, M., Sánchez, Á., Luzón, J. M., y Jorge, G. (2018). Using Semantic Technologies for Formative Assessment and Scoring in Large Courses and MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.468
Spector, J. M., Ifenthaler, D., Samspon, D., Yang, L., Mukama, E., Warusavitarana, A., Lokuge Dona, K., Eichhorn, K., Fluck, A., Huang, R., Bridges, S., Lu, J., Ren, Y., Gui, X., Deneen, C. C., San Diego, J., y Gibson, D. C. (2016). Technology Enhanced Formative Assessment for 21st Century Learning. Educational Technology y Society, 19(3), 58-71.
Stiggins, R. (2005). From Formative Assessment to Assessment for Learning: A Path to Success in Standards-Based Schools. The Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20441998
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., y Panadero, E. (2018). Developing Evaluative judgment: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
UNESCO (2020). The digital transformation of education: connecting schools, empowering learners. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374309
Van der Kleij, F., Adie, L., y Cumming, J. (2015). Using video technology to enable student voice in assessment feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology 22(1), 31-41. https://ddoi/10.1111/bjet.12536
Yuan J., y Kim C. (2016). Effective feedback design using free technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(3), 408-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115571929
Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles that are published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The authors grant the exploitation rights of the work accepted for publication to RIED, guarantee to the journal the right to be the first publication of research understaken and permit the journal to distribute the work published under the license indicated in point 2.
2. The articles are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate electronically the OnlineFirst version (assessed version and accepted for publication) of its articles before publication, always with reference to its publication by RIED, favoring its circulation and dissemination earlier and with this a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
