Communication at university classrooms in the context of COVID-19 by means of videoconferencing with Google Meet

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.27519

Keywords:

Google Meet, university training, university students, COVID-19, virtual education, communication

Abstract

The new reality imposed by COVID-19 has meant one of the greatest challenges that face-to-face university teaching has had to confront, as these higher education centres were suddenly forced to change from a face-to-face format to a virtual, contingent kind of teaching. More precisely, face-to-face communication at classrooms now must rely on synchronous videoconferences which have digitally “occupied” the space that was previously regulated in ordinary lessons. It all required using a wide range of technological applications, amongst which Google Meet stood out as one of the most popular. Based on this, our study set itself two objectives: (1) identifying the communication needs that university students have felt throughout this period of virtual teaching; and (2) verifying the extent to which Google Meet succeeded in meeting those needs. Seeking to accomplish the aforesaid goals, we involved 52 students from the Degree in Primary Education Teacher Training imparted at the University of Alicante. A mixed methodological approach was adopted, the software programs utilized for data processing purposes being SPSS v. 25 and AQUAD 7, which enabled us to carry out a descriptive study and a content analysis, respectively. In view of the results, and although the teaching staff have used a synchronous type of audiovisual communication suited to the demands of students, the degree of satisfaction amongst the latter is remarkably low. Something similar happens when it comes to Google Meet because, despite recognizing that it has positive aspects such as a certain degree of usefulness and enjoyment, they claim to have had serious difficulties in using it. Such findings lead us to conclude that a compelling need exists to fine tune the technological response that universities are giving before the situation caused by COVID-19.

FULL ARTICLE:
https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/27519/22043

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rosabel Roig-Vila, Universidad de Alicante, UA (Spain)

Catedrática de Universidad de Tecnología Educativa (CU) de la Universidad de Alicante y Doctora en Pedagogía (premio extraordinario). Ha sido Decana de la Facultad de Educación de la UA (2005-2009) y actualmente es Directora del Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación de esta universidad. Es editora de la revista electrónica científica Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER) (http://www.naerjournal.ua.es) y dirige el grupo de investigación GIDU-EDUTIC/IN. Web personal: http://www.rosabelroigvila.es

Mayra Urrea-Solano, Universidad de Alicante, UA (Spain)

Profesora asociada del Departamento de Didáctica General y Didácticas Específicas de la Facultad de Educación de la Universidad de Alicante. Forma parte de la Red de Investigación en Diseño y Oportunidades de Género en la Educación Superior (https://bit.ly/3bVFIRY) y del grupo de investigación GIDU-EDUTIC/IN (http://bit.ly/2Ovbafw). Sus líneas de investigación se centran en el estudio de la tecnología educativa, la igualdad de género y el liderazgo en la Educación Superior.

Gladys Merma-Molina, Universidad de Alicante, UA (Spain)

Profesora de la Universidad de Alicante. Doctora por la misma universidad. Directora de la Red de Investigación en Diseño y Oportunidades de Género en la Educación Superior (https://bit.ly/3bVFIRY). Sus investigaciones se centran en la igualdad de género, la convivencia y la educación en valores. Investigadora del Grupo de Investigación GIDU.EDUTIC/IN (http://bit.ly/2Ovbafw) y asesora de Proyectos Iberoamericanos, en la perspectiva de la igualdad de género y la convivencia en la educación. Para obtener más información: https://bit.ly/3aQgZNP

References

Barbosa, S., y Amariles, M. (2019). Learning styles and the use of ICT in university students within a competency-based training model. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.296

Budiana, K. M., y Yutanto H. (2020). Webinar: A strategy to enhance speaking skill of non-native English speaker. Journal of English Educators Society, 5(1), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i1.354

Cabero, J., Barroso, J., y Llorente, Mª. C. (2016). Technology acceptance model & augmented reality: Study in progress. Revista Lasallista de Investigación, 13(2), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v13n2a2

Carrick, F. R., Abdulrahman, M., Hankir, A., Zayaruzny, M., Najem, K., Lungchukiet, P., y Edwards, R. A. (2017). Randomized controlled study of a remote flipped classroom neuro-otology curriculum. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 349. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00349

Cecilio-Fernandes, D., Parisi, M. C. R., Santos, T. M., y Sandars, J. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and the challenge of using technology for medical education in low and middle income countries. MedEdPublish. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000074.1

Cendon, E. (2018). Lifelong learning at universities: Future perspectives for teaching and learning. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), 81-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.320

Chen, C. H., Liao, C. H., Chen, Y. C., y Lee, C. F. (2011). The integration of synchronous communication technology into service learning for pre-service teachers' online tutoring of middle school students. Internet and Higher Education, 14, 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.02.003

Chen, J., Dobinson, T., y Kent, S. (2020). Student’s perspectives on the impact of Blackboard Collaborate on Open University Australia (OUA) online learning. Journal of Educators Online, 17(1). https://bit.ly/3by9qM3. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1688654

Cornelius, S. (2014). Facilitating in a demanding environment: Experiences of teaching in virtual classrooms using web conferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12016

Creswell, J. W., y Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Elo, S., y Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Franchi, T. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on current anatomy education and future careers: A student’s perspective. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1966

Gegenfurtner, A., Zitt, A., y Ebner, C. (2020). Evaluating webinar-based training: A mixed methods study of trainee reactions toward digital web conferencing. International Journal of Training and Development, 24(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12167

Hsieh, H. F., y Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Huber, G. L., y Gürtler, L. (2013). AQUAD 7. Manual: The analysis of qualitative data. Ingeborg Huber Verlag.

Infante-Moro, A., Infante-Moro, J., y Gallardo-Pérez, J. (2019). The importance of ICTs for students as a competence for their future professional performance: The case of the faculty of business studies and tourism of the University of Huelva. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(2), 201-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.7.434

Kerres, M. (2020). Against all odds: Education in Germany coping with COVID-19. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00130-7

Morrison, K. A. (2011). Using web conferencing to teach constructivist, discussion-rich seminars: Can it work? The Quarterly Review on Distance Education, 12(4), 269-274.

Rao, P. (2019). Webinars and their effective use in English language teaching and learning. ELT Vibes: International E-Journal for Research in ELT, 5(1), 73-97.

Sandars, J., Correia, R., Dankbaar, M., de Jong, P., Goh, P. S., Hege, I. … Pusic, M. (2020). Twelve tips for rapidly migrating to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. MedEdPublish. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000082.1

Sandhya, S., Koppad, S. H., Kumar, S. A., Dharani, A., Uma, B. V., y Subramanya, K. N. (2020). Adoption of Google Forms for enhancing collaborative stakeholder engagement in higher education. JEET Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 33, 283-289. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i0/150161

So, S. (2016). Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 31, 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.001

Taha, M. H, Abdalla, M. E., Wadi, M., y Khalafalla, H. (2020). Curriculum delivery in medical education during an emergency: A guide based on the responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. MedEdPublish. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000069.1

Trespalacios, J., y Uribe-Florez, L. (2020). Developing online sense of community: Graduate students’ experiences and perceptions. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.690340

UNESCO. (2020). Handbook on facilitating flexible learning during educational disruption: The Chinese experience in maintaining undisrupted learning in COVID-19 outbreak. https://bit.ly/3fQyeSJ

Villalón, R., Luna, Mª., y García-Barrera, A. (2019). Valoración y uso de la plataforma Blackboard Collaborate en una universidad a distancia: estudio de caso sobre las prácticas declaradas de docentes del Grado de Psicología. Digital Education Review, 35, 267-288.

Published

2021-01-02

How to Cite

Roig-Vila, R., Urrea-Solano, M., & Merma-Molina, G. (2021). Communication at university classrooms in the context of COVID-19 by means of videoconferencing with Google Meet. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana De Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.27519