Can MOOCs promote learning by reducing university dropout rates?

Authors

  • Juan Carlos Aguado Franco Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.20.1.16684

Keywords:

ICT, distance learning, university dropout, higher education

Abstract

Student dropouts at university-level education may result from varied situations and motivations, affecting  the courses taught in the distance learning modality,and assuming a cost for both alumni and society. In order to improve learning and reduce the student dropout rate, we used a teaching methodology with distance learning students involving a MOOC as support to university teaching. The MOOC included written materials, explanatory videos, tests in each module, a forum to communicate with peers and teacher, and links to additional materials. Results were very satisfactory, since students had noticeably improved test scores and the number of students who failed the course remarkably reduced. Students also highly appreciated the quality of teaching and significantly improved the results of the previous year. This methodology awas found to apply only when the contents of the MOOC are similar or complementary to those taught in formal education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguaded, I., y Medina-Salguero, R. (2015). Criterios de calidad para la valoración y gestión de MOOC. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 18 (2), 119-143. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.18.2.13579.

Armstrong, L. (2014). 2013- the Year of Ups and Downs for the MOOCs. Changing Higher Education. Recuperado de: http://goo.gl/SqwGWn

Bartolomé, A. y Steffens, K. (2015): ¿Son los MOOC una alternativa de aprendizaje? Comunicar nº 44, v. XXII, 91-99 Recuperado de:

http://www.revistacomunicar.com/index.php?contenido=detalles&numero=44&articulo=44-2015-10

Cabrera, L. (2015). Efectos del proceso de Bolonia en la reducción del abandono de estudios universitarios: datos para la reflexión y propuestas de mejora. Revista Fuentes, 16, Junio, pp. 39-62. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2015.i16.02

Cabrera, L. et al. (2006). “El problema del abandono de los estudios universitarios”. RELIEVE, v. 12, n. 2. Recuperado de: http://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v12n2/RELIEVEv12n2_1.htm

Colás, P. (2015). El abandono universitario. Revista Fuentes, 16, Junio, pp. 9-14. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2015.i16

García Aretio, L. (2015): MOOC, ¿tsunami, revolución o moda pasajera? RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 18 (1), 9-21. Recuperado de: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.18.2.13579

Guo, Ph., Kim, J., y Rubin, R. (2014). How Video Production Affects Student Engagement: An Empirical Study of MOOC Videos. Recuperado de http://pgbovine.net/publications/edX-MOOC-videoproduction-and-engagement_LAS-2014.pdf

Hill, P. (2014). Emerging student patterns in MOOC: a (revised) graphical view. E-Literate. Recuperado de: http://mfeldstein.com/emerging-student-patterns-in-moocs-a-revised-graphical-view/

Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (2014): “Datos básicos del sistema universitario español. Curso 2014/15. Recuperado de:

http://www.mecd.gob.es/dms/mecd/educacion-mecd/areas-educacion/universidades/estadisticas-informes/datos-cifras/Datos-y-Cifras-del-SUE-Curso-2014-2015.pdf

Poy, R., y Gonzales-Aguilar, A. (2014). Factores de éxito de los MOOC: algunas consideraciones críticas. RISTI. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas de Tecnología de la Información, 1(3), 95-118. Recuperado de: http://www.academypublisher.com/risti/no13/risti13.pdf

Rué, J. (2014): El abandono universitario: variables, marcos de referencia y políticas de calidad. Revista de docencia universitaria. Volumen 12 (2) Agosto , 281-306. Recuperado de http://red-u.net/redu/index.php/REDU/article/view/506

Published

2017-01-02

How to Cite

Aguado Franco, J. C. (2017). Can MOOCs promote learning by reducing university dropout rates?. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana De Educación a Distancia, 20(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.20.1.16684